Skip to content

Climate Observer Posts

Dutch’s MILF Porno Habits

The Netherlands, a country renowned for its open-mindedness and liberal attitudes, has also gained attention for its unique porno preferences. In this article, we will delve into the fascinating world of Netherlands MILF porn habits and provide insights into the consumption patterns of Dutch audiences. From the popularity of certain genres to the preferred platforms for accessing adult content, we will explore it all. So, fasten your seatbelts and get ready for an eye-opening journey into the realm of Dutch milf porn!

The Allure of Netherlands MILF Porn

It’s no secret that MILF porn holds a special place in the hearts (and imaginations) of many individuals. The Netherlands is no exception, with Dutch viewers showing a particular affinity for this genre. The allure of experienced, confident, and mature women undoubtedly contributes to the popularity of MILF porn in the country.

It’s worth mentioning that the term “MILF” stands for “Mother I’d Like to Fuck,” referring to attractive older women who are desirable for sexual encounters. This category often includes women in their 30s to 50s, who exude a sense of confidence and sexual prowess. The appeal of MILF porn lies in the fantasy of engaging with someone more experienced and knowledgeable in the bedroom.

What sets Netherlands MILF porn habits apart from other regions is the acceptance and celebration of mature sexuality. Dutch society embraces the idea that sexual desire and pleasure can be enjoyed at any age.

The Evolution of Netherlands MILF Porn

Over the years, Netherlands MILF porn has seen an evolution both in terms of content and consumption patterns.

Content-wise, there has been a shift towards more diverse and inclusive representations of mature women in adult films. The emphasis is on showcasing the diversity of beauty and body types, highlighting that eroticism knows no bounds when it comes to age.

In terms of consumption patterns, Dutch viewers have moved away from traditional means of accessing adult content, such as DVDs or adult stores. Instead, the internet has become the primary platform for indulging in Netherlands MILF porn.

The Role of Online Platforms

When it comes to accessing Netherlands MILF porn, online platforms have revolutionized the industry.

Popular websites and streaming platforms have made it easier than ever to satisfy one’s sexual desires with just a few clicks. These platforms provide a wide range of content, catering to specific preferences and fetishes.

The convenience and privacy offered by online platforms have played a significant role in the growing popularity of Netherlands MILF porn. Individuals can explore their fantasies discreetly and without judgment, creating a safe space for sexual exploration.

The Impact of Streaming and Premium Services

With the rise of streaming services and premium content platforms, Dutch viewers can now access high-quality Netherlands MILF porn with ease.

Subscription-based platforms like Pornhub Premium and OnlyFans have gained considerable traction, offering exclusive content from their favorite milf performers. These platforms often provide a more immersive and interactive experience, enhancing the viewer’s satisfaction.

Streaming platforms have also made it possible to enjoy Netherlands MILF porn in virtual reality (VR), creating a sense of realism and heightened engagement. As technology advances, VR experiences are becoming more accessible and lifelike, appealing to users seeking a truly immersive experience.

Genres and Preferences

In the realm of Netherlands MILF porn, like any other genre, there is a wide variety of sub-genres and preferences that cater to diverse tastes. Let’s explore some of the most popular genres and preferences among Dutch audiences.

Interracial MILF Porn

The appeal of interracial porn is not limited to any specific country, and the Netherlands is no exception. Dutch viewers often indulge in interracial MILF porn, finding pleasure in the eroticism and cultural nuances captured in such scenes.

Interracial MILF porn provides an amalgamation of sexual desire and curiosity, showcasing the exploration of different cultures and ethnicities. The genre offers a unique mix of passion, intensity, and forbidden fantasies, adding to its widespread appeal.

Lesbian MILF Porn

Lesbian MILF porn is another genre that holds a special place in the hearts of Dutch viewers. The combination of mature women and same-sex encounters provides an exciting and arousing experience for many.

The appeal of lesbian encounters lies in the celebration of female pleasure and sensuality. Dutch audiences find the portrayal of mature women exploring their desires and engaging in passionate encounters to be both empowering and thrilling.

BDSM and Fetish MILF Porn

For those with more adventurous tastes, BDSM and fetish MILF porn offer a tantalizing journey into the realms of dominance, submission, and kink.

Dutch viewers with a penchant for BDSM and fetish genres often seek out milf performers exploring their fantasies and pushing boundaries. The art of blending power dynamics, sensory play, and intense pleasure creates an irresistible allure for many.

The world of Netherlands MILF porn is as diverse and fascinating as the country itself. Dutch viewers’ unique set of preferences and consumption habits shape the industry, with MILF porn occupying a central position.

As we’ve explored in this article, the acceptance and celebration of mature sexuality, the evolution of content, and the role of online platforms have contributed to the popularity of Netherlands MILF porn. From interracial encounters to lesbian fantasies and BDSM adventures, Dutch audiences have a wide range of genres and preferences to choose from.

As technology continues to advance and societal attitudes evolve, it will be intriguing to see how Netherlands MILF porn habits further develop and redefine the adult entertainment landscape.

USA’s Deathliest Political Divide: Climate Change

When it comes to the issue of climate change, there are two main camps: liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans. Democrats are more likely to believe that many environmental disasters are heading our way and that individual and policy actions can help us avoid these. However, Republicans are less likely to think that any six steps will make a significant difference. Likewise, most conservative Republicans believe that any action will make little or no difference.

The majority of Independents favor policies.

A new poll shows that most Americans favor federal government policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. While Republicans and some labor unions have criticized the idea, Americans generally agree that we must act now to stop climate change from getting out of control, so instead of spending a couple hours browsing through yespornplease, maybe we should take action somehow. In a poll conducted between June 11 and 14, more than 3,000 individuals were surveyed. Most respondents believe the United States should transition to clean energy within a decade. They also say that the move to clean energy will create new jobs and economic growth.

Republicans and Democrats remain divided on their views on climate change. While most Democrats support action to prevent global warming, only thirty-seven percent of Republicans support it. Republicans and Democrats together account for 57% of the population. As a result, it is crucial to understand whether the two partisan groups are more or less in agreement on this issue.

Independents make up the other 43% of Americans.

Among the policies supported by the majority of Democrats and Independents is a plan to require power plants to reduce carbon emissions by 30% over 2005. The federal government should also include policies to reduce emissions through a federal stimulus package. Ultimately, if we want to address climate change, we should eliminate fossil fuels as soon as possible.

Although most Americans favor energy efficiency policies, this support for such policies declines drastically when asked how they will pay for them. Despite this divide, many Americans believe that transitioning to clean energy will help the economy. For example, 58% of Americans think this policy will create more jobs. Meanwhile, 14% say it will harm the economy. Interestingly, Republicans and conservative Republicans are particularly skeptical of the benefits of policies on climate change.

However, while Americans generally support policies aimed at combating climate change, the climate policy debate has resulted in significant partisan divisions in Congress. Moreover, the US public remains divided between watching animeidhentai videos or not. It has historically been one of the most divisive issues in foreign policy. It is important to remember that these differences are not mutually exclusive.

The majority of Democrats favor policies.

A recent Pew survey showed that a majority of Democrats favor policies that will limit carbon pollution. Republicans are about as likely to support these measures. Most Americans also support government investments in technologies to capture carbon emissions, including wind power and solar panels. But while many Americans support these policies, the Republican Party has fought against them in the past.

The two parties stay divided on the urgency of climate change policies. Democrats tend to think human activities are a significant cause of global warming, . Republicans tend to be less concerned. In the 1999 poll, the gap between Republicans and Democrats was only 14 points. As for the 2018 poll, that gap had grown to 56 points.

However, younger Democrats are less satisfied with the current climate policies.

They are more likely to say that the Biden administration needs to do more. The Pew poll, conducted in May, found that young Americans are not thrilled with the direction of the US government’s climate policy.

As the election season approaches, Democrats have a good chance of retaking the US Senate, a move that could have enormous implications for climate change policy. They would then be able to confirm presidential appointees easier, make the legislation more likely to pass, and even rescind controversial rules. Ultimately, this would mean a significant victory for the Democratic Party in climate change policy.

Although the US Senate has failed to adopt legislation to address climate change, two-thirds of Democrats support climate policies. In addition to President Obama’s efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, President Obama and Vice President Biden both found broad support for their climate legislation. In addition, vice President Biden has pledged to rejoin the Paris climate agreement.

While the Democratic electorate stays split on climate change policy, there are still significant differences between conservative and progressive views within the party. For example, liberals favor ambitious liberal policies, while conservatives favor limiting government spending. In addition, younger Democrats favor progressive policies, while older Democrats lean toward conservative policies.

The majority of Republicans oppose policies.

Recent polls have shown that Republicans are not just opposed to climate change legislation but also oppose the policies that curb it. According to a recent Pew Research Center poll, 82 percent of Republicans said climate change policies were going in the wrong direction. But younger Republicans are more likely to prioritize climate change as an issue, with 47 percent of Republicans under thirty saying that the federal government wasn’t doing enough to protect the environment.

While the Republican Party once rejected climate change, many lawmakers are now willing to discuss the issue. One example is Republican congressman John Curtis, who has formed a Climate Caucus with more than 70 Republican members. And last month, House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy released a climate platform outlining Republican plans for combating hanime porn issues if re-elected in November.

In addition to supporting policies to curb climate change, most Americans support increasing government funding to support clean energy research. But Republicans are less enthusiastic about spending US tax dollars to help developing nations fight climate change. Only 36% of Republican voters support US tax money on climate change initiatives. In comparison, 70% of Democrats and 58% of independents favor the idea.

Democrats and Republicans are likely to support the idea of a carbon tax to reduce carbon emissions.

In addition, more than 60% of Americans think that global warming is accurate and its effects are already visible. But most Republicans are not willing to spend more money to combat climate change, despite supporting these policies.

In contrast, Democrats place greater importance on climate change than Republicans. According to a recent Pew Research Center poll, climate change was voters’ 14th most crucial issue. Moreover, while Republicans aren’t concerned about the issue, younger and moderate Republicans are more worried about the topic than older Republicans.

A majority of Democrats believe that global warming is a real problem and that it is a growing threat. While the number of Republicans is lower, it is still more than double that of Democrats who believe in climate change. Overall, 87% of Democrats believe that global temperatures have increased over the last hundred years and that climate change is real. In addition, most Democrats believe that unchecked global warming will hurt them personally.

Ordinary people should do more to combat climate change.

Many believe that the average person can do more to fight climate change. Two-thirds of Americans feel they must do something to limit global warming. However, solving the problem will require an unprecedented overhaul of the world’s energy system, and social systems will also have to change.

One of the most important ways for ordinary people to combat climate change is to vote. Make sure to research the energy views of candidates and vote for those with the most ambitious policies. There are many other ways to be an activist and reduce one’s carbon footprint. Consider the following ideas for ways to reduce your impact on the environment: – Get involved in local politics. Consider contacting your legislators and urging them to pass comprehensive climate policies.

Adopt a plant-rich diet. This can help combat climate change in many ways. It also saves resources by reducing the amount of food you consume. It also helps to reduce the amount of water and energy you use. In addition, adopting a plant-based diet will help reduce the amount of food waste we produce.

Methane Leaks Are Speeding Climate Change

Despite its powerful greenhouse gas properties, methane isn’t well-known to the public. The EPA’s new rule for coal-fired power plants only addresses this scourge in power plants. That’s unfortunate since methane is hundreds of times more potent than carbon dioxide, so plugging these leaks is crucial to combating climate change. Amongst all the furry porn featured on the platform we can find many news about the matter, but no one seems to be listening. So how do we know that we are experiencing these leaks?

Methane is a potent greenhouse gas

Researchers can now identify the largest sources of methane emissions and have calculated the emissions of these emitters as a fraction of the total carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. These “ultra emitters” are essentially part of the petroleum industry and are concentrated in significant oil and gas-producing basins. However, they are still far from the source of most of the emissions.

Secretive methane leaks significantly contribute to climate change, particularly in Central Asia, which is home to the world’s largest gas reserves. The state is highly secretive about methane production, with Soviet-era technology hindering its development. But according to Kayrros, a climate scientist from Penn State University, 31 of the 50 worst leaks globally in 2019 occurred in Turkmenistan, along with Venezuela, Iran, Algeria, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia.

Regardless of the source of methane, it is an enormous contributor to climate change.

Methane has a much higher warming effect than carbon dioxide despite its small size. And the two gases are different in how they break down in the atmosphere. Methane molecules emitted today are 80 times more potent than CO2 molecules by 2045. If these emissions are to be reduced to zero, it will slow global warming instantly.

Moreover, only a fraction of the wells is responsible for methane emissions. Therefore, retrofitting them would dramatically reduce emissions. And capturing methane would add to the costs of the retrofitting process.

Some researchers question the long-term efficacy of short-term calculations and recommend a separate target for methane emissions. They believe that it will be more reliable to target methane cuts instead of CO2 reductions, as the former has the potential to increase global warming, we can get steaming hot according to predictions, surpassing even to when we watch some sexy porn. In addition, if methane cuts are successful, they may allow governments to focus their limited resources on methane emissions instead. However, some scientists are cautioned against over-reliance on these measures, as the reductions in carbon dioxide will likely only worsen matters.

It can warm the planet

If you are an environmentalist, you know the power of methane to warm the planet. It lingers in the atmosphere for less time than CO2 but is far more potent at warming the earth in the short term. Methane is nearly 80 times more potent than CO2 at warming the planet in a short time. By comparison, CO2 molecules will remain more powerful at warming the world for 100 years.

Methane leaks have the potential to warm the planet significantly. For example, the most recent super-emitter event occurred in the Gulf of Mexico in December 2021, when an oil and gas platform discharged 40,000 tonnes of methane over 17 days. This release of methane is equivalent to three percent of Mexico’s total oil and gas emissions yearly. The European Space Agency captured the emissions from this leak with its satellites.

Methane is the second-leading contributor to climate change after CO2.

However, it has received less attention than CO2, which has been the primary focus of climate action for many years. The goal of reducing CO2 emissions is a lofty one, but methane emissions must also be cut at the source. The resulting reductions in both methane and CO2 will stabilize the climate.

Methane does not have as long of an effect on global warming as carbon dioxide. However, it is more potent than carbon dioxide at warming the planet on a 20-year timescale. The Arctic Ocean is home to immense amounts of methane stored in the form of methane hydrates, equivalent to three to 30 times the total carbon dioxide emissions since the Industrial Revolution. It is not difficult to understand why methane is so potent.

It can be removed from the air

Methane is a potent greenhouse gas, far more so than carbon dioxide. Scientists are worried that a sudden surge in methane emissions will undermine efforts by governments to hold planetary warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. However, climate negotiators underestimate methane’s warming potential by a factor of three. Moreover, governments are not sufficiently addressing methane emissions with less than a quarter century to achieve net-zero emissions under the 2015 Paris Agreement. 

While there are various measures to limit methane emissions, most focus is not on the issue of methane-producing infrastructure. Instead, these measures include plugging abandoned gas wells, sealing pipelines, covering landfills, and preventing crop waste.

Scientists estimate that converting half of the atmosphere’s methane to carbon dioxide would only raise the carbon content in the atmosphere by 0.2 percent – a tiny amount. However, this change would save 16 percent of the total amount of radiative warming emitted by the atmosphere. This is an excellent example of why the methane-reduction plan must be pursued. However, it would require substantial money and a significant amount of work to cut the emissions from the methane-producing sectors.

Scientists have uncovered the latest methane super-emitter event in the Gulf of Mexico. An oil and gas platform discharged 40,000 tonnes of methane over 17 days in December 2021 – equivalent to 3 percent of Mexico’s annual oil and gas emissions. The European Space Agency’s satellite could detect and capture the emissions from this massive leak. And because the emissions are uncontrolled, the climate will get worse.

It is likely to be thousands of years old

A new study has revealed that the United States is responsible for the most significant percentage of methane emissions – 544,000 tons a year – from a gas-rich region in North Texas. That’s more than the entire population of Connecticut and Nevada combined. The study was led by NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, which found that the number of methane emissions globally increased by about 25 percent after 2006. It also concluded that methane-emitting facilities were responsible for between 12 and 19 million tons of methane, the equivalent of the annual emissions of 40 million people.

Scientists have previously estimated that methane emissions from the energy sector are responsible for about 134 MT of methane annually. Unfortunately, most of this methane comes from poorly managed oil and gas installations, which rely on outdated, inefficient infrastructure. In addition, these “leaky” fossil fuel installations are often not adequately maintained, meaning they leak methane despite being inspected regularly.

Methane emissions are increasing worldwide, and most of the increases have been caused by faster-growing biogenic sources. Natural wetlands, flooded rice fields, landfills, and livestock in the tropics are responsible for most of the growth. In the future, climate scientists have also warned that melting permafrost in the Arctic could unleash a wave of warming – and the same is likely to happen in tropical wetlands.

Methane is the main contributor to climate change. Scientists estimate that the Curua-Una dam in Para, Brazil produces three and a half times the greenhouse effect of the oil. When the reservoir is flooded and the plant matter floats on the bottom, the plants decompose but do not receive enough oxygen. So as water flows through the turbines, it releases dissolved methane into the atmosphere.

How can we fight it

Experts have warned that methane leaks can cause significant global warming, but cutting emissions could prevent nearly 0.3C of warming by 2045. This could prevent the air pollution that contributes to air pollution and premature death that have plagued our planet for decades. In addition, while carbon dioxide is responsible for most global warming, methane is only a tiny fraction of the problem and breaks down in the atmosphere within a decade.

The Biden administration recently launched the Global Methane Pledge at the Glasgow climate conference, calling for global action to prevent these super-polluting leaks. The US is among the world’s largest methane emitters, so sealing leaks is crucial. The US not only emits as much methane as deathly possible but they also film almost 70% of all femboy porn online. But how can we prevent leaks? It’s possible to close super-sources cheaply and stop them before they start affecting climate change. In addition, some experts believe that sealing methane leaks in pipelines can generate financial benefits and even profit from the sale of methane.

A problem we can not ignore

In North Texas, for instance, some 544,000 tons of methane leakage every year, or about 1.5 percent of the planet’s total emissions. That’s equivalent to 46 million tons of CO2 in a year – more than the state of Nevada or Connecticut. According to a 2015 study led by NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, methane levels increased sharply after 2006 and were now between 19 million tons yearly. Approximately 12 percent of that increase is attributable to fossil fuels, with the rest likely a combination of the two.

Cutting methane emissions is one of the best options for slowing global warming. It costs relatively minor compared to other actions to curb global warming. For example, capturing methane leaks at fossil fuel sites is highly profitable. A quarter-century is enough time for the world to reach net-zero emissions. So, it is an excellent time to take action and prevent future leaks.

Greta Thunberg leads climate change protests in Italy

Hundreds of young people, led by Swedish activist Greta Thunberg, march in the Italian city of Milan. All to demand rapid action on climate change this week ahead of the crucial UN climate conference COP26 in Glasgow. Swedish activist and climate advocate Greta Thunberg walked in Milan in need of swift action on climate change. This ahead of the crucial COP26 UN Climate Conference this week in Glasgow, Scotland.

The 18-year-old climate activist who is considered a potential Nobel Peace Prize winner visited the Italian city of Milan as part of an official UN summit on the youth version of the crucial UN climate conference COP26. It is expected to be attended by around 400 people. The Swedish activist and her march in Milan were part of an official United Nations gathering for the meeting, which was due to take place on October 8.

Thunberg and Ugandan activist Vanessa Nakate Porn were in Milan as part of the UN Youth Version of the crucial COP26 Environmental Summit in Glasgow. To which around 400 young people were invited. The activists’ proposals will come under scrutiny at a meeting of climate change and energy ministers at COP26. This will take place just days before the climate summit.

They want to be heard

Greta Thunberg and other youth activists struck a skeptical tone this week ahead of the climate talks in Italy. They said that three decades after a landmark summit on earth there are too many promises. The reality is that too little has been done to combat global warming. Youth activists, whose fight against climate change is high on the global agenda this year after leaders pledged to address environmental issues and challenges at the Rio Summit in Brazil in 1992. This will help find solutions at COP26 in November at the UN Summit.

The 18-year-old climate activist is due to receive the Nobel Peace Prize on October 8 at Milan as part of the official UN rally for the COP26 youth edition in Milan. Thunberg addressed the United Nations Climate Change Conference 2018 alongside student strikes taking place around the world this week. After being invited by the world to express their views at the crucial COP26 climate summit in October, youth activists in Milan felt they were not being heard.

Everything began in May 2018 at the start of the school strike. Thunberg was one of the winners of an essay competition organized by the Swedish newspaper Svenska xvideos Dagbladet for young people. Four hundred youth activists from more than 9,000 applicants were chosen by the United Nations to take part in the event in Milan. The event was intended to provide a platform for young people to express their views on the climate crisis and the inaction of policymakers in dealing with it. On September 23, Thunberg attended the UN Climate Summit in New York City.

Thunberg leads climate protests in Italy ahead of COP26 | Climate Change  News | Al Jazeera

Advocating for a clean future

Thunberg participated in climate protests in Montreal, Edmonton and Vancouver in Canada, including a global climate action rally on September 27 in Montreal. In August 2018, Greta Tim, Eleonora Ernman and Thunberg spent their school days in front of the Swedish parliament. This is where they held signs like Skolstrejkklimatet (School Strike for Climate) calling for decisive action against climate change. Thunberg points out that climate change has a disproportionate impact on young people and that it will affect the future.

Her speech became an outcry from climate activists on social media. The march came as ministers from several dozen countries met for meetings to prepare for the COP26 Summit in Scotland. Protesters in Milan said they wanted to see change before COP26 begins in Glasgow, Scotland, on October 31.

The meeting comes as soaring energy prices on world markets have stoked fears of a public backlash against climate change reform. Thunberg, who took the microphone at the end of the march, repeated her criticism of leaders who, she said, “talk about action.”. Since her speech, ‘blah blah blah blah blah’ has become on social media a rallying cry for climate justice activists.

The British president at COP26 said the presence of youth delegates and activists would boost the process. Delegates will have the opportunity to exchange views with government officials in Milan. But the pandemic has reduced the number of young people attending climate events.

Climate change effects on Italy

On Monday, a series of storms struck north-west Italy and brought in over 742 mm of rainfall. This is the most ever recorded in Europe, the country was hit with rain in just over 12 hours. The storms in northern Italy slowed traffic to avoid an unprecedented rainfall across Europe.

A series of storms hit the Italian province of Genoa. Known for its natural beauty and rugged beaches. Between Sunday and Monday, bringing over 925 mm of rain to the city of Rossiglione, 100 km southwest of Milan.

According to former climate scientist and expert Maximiliano Herrera, the storm fell by 750 mm in just 12 hours. Thus setting a new record for Europe’s highest 12-hour rainfall. Dozens had to be rescued and reports of mudslides and flooding clouded the picture. This was before the main bridge collapsed in the city of Quiliano near Milan, reported Corriere della Sera. The humid climate is not unusual in this part of Italy. As the region averages in every 12 months 1,200 mm of rainfall. But on Monday a series of thunderstorms stopped in the region. The day brought 925 mm of rain to the city of Rossiglione xhamster, about 100 km southwest of Milan.

A few miles east were breathtaking rains flooding the nearby town of Vicomorasso. Mmore than 180 mm falling in just over an hour according to Floodlist, an organization documenting severe flooding around the world. A few miles east, another deluge of rain flooded the nearby town of Vico. This town saw 180 mm of rain in an hour. Completing flood lists for some of the most important flooding events around the globe.

Europe faces climate change consequences

Deadly flooding made headlines this summer around the world. This includes deadly floods throughout Western Europe. All in July after a few months of rain fell in a matter of hours and took roads to torrential rain in Belgium and Germany. This summer also made headlines around the world. Together with deadly flooding in July in Western Europe after a couple of months of rain fell in a matter of days. In May of this year, heavy rains and floods hit Bosnia and Serbia. Resulting in the killing of 33 people. It also forced thousands of households to be cut off from electricity after several months of rain in a few days.

A day before the floods swept through Western Germany, the European Weather Agency issued an extreme flood warning. Detailed models showed the storm was threatening to swell rivers to levels not seen in 500 to 1,000 years, according to German meteorologists. The European Meteorological Agency issued a warning after indicating the storm could push the Rhine banks back to the levels. All predicted by the German meteorologist on Friday.

By comparison, the remnants of Hurricane Ida flooded Central Park with 31.5 inches in early September. A record that fell in just one hour, surpassing the previous record of 1 hour set. This was 11 days earlier by Tropical Storm Henri, which drenched the region. Just over a week ago, the remnant of Hurricane Irma brought torrents of rainfall to the Northeast. This set daily records in New Jersey and New England. A week later, another remnant of the same storm brought another deluge of rain to the region, setting daily and historic records in the same states.

China floods: 12 dead in Zhengzhou train and thousands evacuated in Henan -  BBC News

Worldwide concern for climate change

In August, Tennessee broke its previous national record of 17 inches of rain. Which fell on the town of McEwen within 24 hours. By comparison, 92.5 mm of rain is the average rainfall expected in Seattle this year. By comparison, Seattle is expected to receive the most rainfall every 12 months. And 300 mm of precipitation correspond to more than 3 years of precipitation in 24 hours.

Heavy rains caused floods in central China in July, killing more than 300 people. Deadly flash floods make headlines around the world during summer. The deadliest flooding in Western Europe in July occurred a few months ago. This was the value of an hour’s rain turned the streets of major cities in Belgium and Germany into torrential floods. Heavy rains have caused floods in central China this July, killing more than 300 people.

The storm flooded the parched city of Al Khaburah. With 300 mm of rainfall in just a few hours. This equates to more than 3 years of rainfall in Oman in 24 hours. In Oman, rare tropical cyclones bring years of rain and cause deadly flooding in the desert landscapes that receive so much rain each year. Oman’s unusual tropical cyclone has caused years of expensive rains. There is even deadly flooding in desert scenery that usually sees a lot of rain in an entire year. Italy’s Genoa province, characterized by its sheer grandeur and rugged coastline, has become the epicenter of recent excessive rainfall.

Biden climate policy: Will it save the environment?

President Joe Biden signed an executive order with the federal government to counter the threat of climate change, calling it an economic boom expected to create millions of jobs.

A first sign that his administration is moving quickly to reverse the Trump administration’s infamous environmental policies. Biden will announce a sweeping moratorium on new oil and gas drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.

The executive orders are part of a series of measures Biden has taken since taking office. They cover various issues, from energy efficiency, πορνο and renewable energy to energy security and environmental protection—essential topics neglected by Trump’s administration.

“We intend to move quickly on implementing these measures”, he said, according to a statement from the White House’s Management and Budget Office.

Climate change is an ideal issue that Biden at all costs should highlight: it is a real emergency that must be addressed. He will receive accurate, united support from the administration.

The Biden administration promises to kick-start -and propitiate- investments in new energy. Unleash much-needed investment in renewable energy, and enable the US to rejoin the global community to fight against climate change. Biden said he would also integrate climate change initiatives into his administration’s national security and foreign policy.

Pressing problems to solve NOW

Climate change, the impact of global warming on our polarizing society, and the need for a healthy society who watches xhamster videos, as well as a safe economy are among the pressing problems facing Biden’s administration, . Using the nation’s emissions-reduction programs to address these challenges, a future Biden administration is ready to put climate change at the centre of US policy.

For the first time, the White House will have a domestic climate policy office to coordinate Biden’s climate agenda. The administration will also boast of a national climate task force, which will consist of 21 officials willing to take an entire – or entire – government approach to reducing emissions.

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin’s announcement comes just days after President Joe Biden signed an executive order to combat the climate crisis. The White House announcement of the National Climate Panel comes less than a week after signing executive orders to combat climate crises.

US President Joe Biden has moved quickly to sign sweeping climate-change-fighting orders, ranging from freezing government oil and gas leases to ending lucrative fossil-fuel subsidies. Biden said he would recommend the United States to the Paris climate accord.

Former President Donald J. Trump has announced his intention to withdraw and lead efforts to get significant countries to step up efforts to combat global warming. In his first week in office, Biden returned to the UN climate talks in Paris, some of which are the largest – ever – organized attempts to combat climate change. The nations had agreed on common goals, like maybe regulate porn, but talks to prevent “dangerous” changes had failed.

A problem that affects everyone

Biden also said he supports policies that many environmental economists believe are crucial to effectively mitigate climate change. Joe Biden’s climate priorities for his first week in office include reducing greenhouse and redtube gas emissions by setting a target of no more than 2.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels by 2050.

Biden’s proposals reflect many aspects of his environmental goals that are reminiscent of the Obama administration’s policies. Biden has the chance to win the support of many environmental economists, say experts. Many who say climate change need to be addressed in a bipartisan way to address global warming’s long-term impact on the US economy and the environment.

Biden hopes to use his climate policies to bridge the gap between younger progressive Democrats who support bold actions against global warming and the working class. This issue that must be worked on is losing jobs as the economy shifts away from fossil fuels. He said: “The whole approach is classic Biden: working class values that get people back to work.”

Biden has included a new accounted political advisor, specialized in climate change and environmental policy, Heather Zichal.

Taking action is now

Biden’s focus on responding to climate change and his commitment to a “carbon-free economy” could help broaden the coalition behind the action. The ultimate form of his climate policy will shape the geopolitical and economic landscape of the twenty-first century. Dictate future US emissions, and help determine whether the world can avert the worst effects of catastrophic climate change. Suppose the Biden administration wants to invest in closer cooperation with Beijing. In that case, Thomas Greenfield may face the challenge of reconciling criticism and collaboration with China.

The Biden administration could revive the German text. The Security Council should do more to address the risks associated with climate change and its impact on the global economy. Joe Biden could mark his first day as president with one or more executive orders announcing his intention to rejoin the Paris accord, submit an international agreement on coolant for ratification, or fulfil the far-reaching climate promises made on the campaign trail.

The White House says the new executive order will help push the US into the Paris agreement and the UN climate change conference in Paris in December. Biden and his cabinet have previously declared their intention to include climate change in their national security agenda.

Biden has called the climate crisis “an existential threat of our time.” In the same paper, Biden said he would also create a “screening tool for climate and economic justice” to identify threatened communities. The Biden administration has promised to spend billions on developing clean energy and renewable energy technologies such as solar and wind. He has made creating thousands of “clean energy jobs” a top priority, according to a campaign press release and a speech to the Democratic National Convention.

Where Does The US Stand In Terms of Climate Change Policies?

The artic is melting, Australia has been ravaged by deadly wildfires and the world has been suffering the effects of climate change for some time now. For years, scientists have been warning us about what could happen if we don’t do something to appease climate change made even worse by global warming.  

It is no secret the position Donald Trump has taken on climate change after calling it a “hoax” and a “big scam”, and this position has resulted in his administration making decisions that cause rollbacks in climate policies. Here are some of the most consequential ones.

Pulling out of the Paris climate agreement 

On November 2019, Trump’s administration officially announced to the United Nations that it would withdraw from the Paris Agreement, the first truly global commitment to fight the climate crisis. In 2015, nearly 200 countries and the European Union signed on to this agreement. 

The Paris Agreement was successful because it allowed each country to set its own emission reduction targets and which strategies to adopt in order to reach them. Moreover, nations recognized that fighting climate change can bring significant socio-economic results.

The US President’s decision to pull out of the agreement sent a clear message that they would not be leading this global fight against climate change. And even though no other country has followed Trump’s decision, a few have toughened their emission-reduction targets. In addition, a report found that “Trump’s decision has made it easier for other countries to renege on their climate commitments.”

However, whether or not America participates in the agreement depends on the outcome of the 2020 election but still, supporters of the pact have to start planning for a future without American cooperation. 

Loosening restrictions on methane emissions 

Last August, Trump’s administration laid out its plan to cut back on the regulation of methane emissions, one of the biggest contributors to climate change greenhouse gases, and announced that they would “no longer require oil and gas companies to install monitors that detect methane leaks from new wells, tanks and pipelines.”  

This move is significant, since the US is the world’s biggest natural gas and oil producer and even though methane doesn’t last in the atmosphere as long as carbon dioxide (CO2), one ton of methane has 84 to 87 times more global warming potential than the same amount of CO2 over a 20-year period. This means that methane comes second after carbon dioxide as the most significant greenhouse gases, making up for nearly 10 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States mostly coming from the oil and gas industry. 

Since President Trump’s earliest days in the office, the Obama administration has been targeted, including its methane regulation. The new methane rule would replace the one from the Obama administration as a response to President Trump’s calls to trim regulations that impede economic growth. 

In 2018, the National Climate Assessment concluded that the worsening of wildfires, crop failures, among other things, were increased by global warming caused by greenhouse gases. Some of the biggest oil and gas companies have called on the Trump administration to strengthen the methane restrictions rather than loosen them.

The Affordable Clean Energy rule 

In 2015, Obama’s administration launched the Clean Power Plan, which placed limits on carbon dioxide emissions from power plants. According to Obama’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), this plan would have reduced carbon dioxide emissions from power generators by 32% compared with 2005 by 2030. 

Trump’s replacement for the Clean Power Plan is called the Affordable Clean Energy rule and it does not longer place limits on carbon dioxide emissions but instead allows states to set their own emissions standards for coal-fueled power plants. This could have serious repercussions in people’s health and the planet. 

Current EPA administrator Andrew Wheeler promoted the plan stating that it gives power companies “the regulatory certainty they need to continue to reduce emissions and provide affordable and reliable energy for all Americans.” However, many states and cities are suing in order to get these new regulations blocked from going into effect since Trump’s new rule could cause over 1,400 premature deaths by 2030 and it could also cost American lives.

These examples are only to mention some. But it seems that Trump’s rhetoric has shifted. This week, he talked climate change saying “nothing’s a hoax about that. It’s a very serious subject.” Does this mean that Trump suddenly became worried about climate change and global warming and its impact on people’s health and economy or could it be just a strategy to win this year’s polls?

Donald Trump’s record on climate change makes him politically vulnerable, that’s a fact and if his rhetoric on climate change is shifting, it’s because he senses the politics are now different. In order to be re-elected, the President needs to win Florida, a state on the front line of climate impacts and where the majority of its residents understand the impacts of climate change. Trump has recently even moved officially to Florida and launched his campaign there. 

Each day, more and more states beside Florida are waking up to the reality of this climate crisis and are starting to prioritize the issue. They demand to the authorities to tackle this crisis with adequate climate policies. Despite his administration making systemic attacks on the air, water and public health for the past three years, the truth is that Donald Trump is the president after all, and he can take real action starting now. 

Blackrock Goes Green?

World’s Largest Investment Company Changes to Sustainable Policies.

  BlackRock is an American global investment management company based in New York City. It was founded in 1988 by Larry Fink, current president and CEO and Robert Kapito, also president of the company. BlackRock is considered to be the largest asset management company in the world, and it is one of the most influential financial groups on Wall Street and Washington. 

The company functions by investing its assets in equity strategies, cash management, alternative investments and real estate strategies and through BlackRock SolutionsÆ they offer risk management services, strategic advice and their own investment systems to a wide client base whose portfolios total around eight billion dollars. 

BlackRock has presented itself as a sustainable investor, however, reports have shown that the company is in fact, the world’s largest investor in coal plant developers with shares worth around $11 billion among 56 coal plant developers. With global warming increasing at dangerous rates these last few years, environmental groups such as the Sierra Club and Amazon Watch called out BlackRock by launching a campaign called “BlackRock’s Big Problem” in September 2018. This campaign stated that Blackrock “is the biggest driver of climate destruction on the planet”.

Another report showed that BlackRock owns more oil, gas, and thermal coal reserves than any other investor with 30 percent of total energy-related emissions from 2017, due in part to the company’s refusal to divest from fossil fuel companies.

Last year, the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis released a report that estimated that BlackRock had lost investors worth $90 billion over the past decade due to poor performing investments in fossil fuel companies.

Recently, BlackRock announced that sustainability will be their new investment standard through a letter on the official website. “In recent years, an increasing number of our clients have focused on the impact of sustainability in their investment portfolios. […] The most significant of these factors relate to climate change, not only in terms of the physical risk associated with rising global temperatures but also in the risk of transition – mainly in how the global transition to a low-carbon economy could affect the long-term profitability of a company.” 

Moreover, an open letter to BlackRock’s clients was released alongside with a series of changes the company will make to put sustainability at the center of its investment approach.  These changes include increasing the number of sustainable funds it offers, removing some coal companies from its active funds and being more transparent over its engagement and voting at investee companies.

“As your fiduciary, BlackRock is committed to helping you navigate this transition and build more resilient portfolios, and this includes seeking higher and more stable long-term returns. Because sustainable investment options have the potential to offer better results to costumers, we are making sustainability an integral element in how BlackRock manages risk, build portfolios, design products and interact with companies. We believe that sustainability should be the new investment standard.” 

Earlier in January, after the increasing pressure from activists, the US investment firm joined Climate Action 100+, a group of more than 370 investment managers with a total of $41 trillion in assets and who seeks for companies whose businesses exacerbate climate change to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. 

There has been some controversy since BlackRock, who manages assets from BP, Shell and Exxon Mobile, has voted against various resolutions brought by Climate Action 100+ and this has increased the backlash and accusations against the company. Regardless, the fact that they are now signed onto Climate Action 100+ could mean a change in the company to finally stop being behind holding the world’s biggest emitters of greenhouse gases accountable.

“In joining CA100+, BlackRock is responding to the demands of its asset-owner clients and other groups globally that they take meaningful action to address climate change,” Fiona Reynolds, chief executive of UN-backed investment group Principles for Responsible Investment said in a statement.

The fact that the world’s biggest investment corporation is joining forces with a company whose mission is to get other powerful companies to reduce their greenhouse gases emissions could be an important step towards persuading other companies to join as well and together help decrease the acceleration of global warming and climate change.

“BlackRock’s initiatives match the size of the crisis we are currently seeing. Making climate change the number one priority in their business is the way every company must respond to this planetary emergency” expressed Diana Best, senior strategist of Sunrise Project, a non-profit organization that seeks to gather other companies to fight for climate change.